The Optimal Trade Bargaining Strategies in the Negotiation of DDA*
نویسنده
چکیده
s: This paper examines the optimal trade negotiation strategies in the trade negotiation involving multi-parties such as Doha Development Agenda, which is characterized by asymmetric multiple negotiators with multi-trade issues. Due to the consensus rule, which is the formal decision making rule of WTO, bilateral bargaining formula is often taken simultaneously with the multilateral bargaining formula. We demonstrate that the large economy, which might pose a fundamental objection, prefers the sequential bilateral negotiation, while multilateral negotiation from the initial stage of bargaining is welfare dominant for small economies. World welfare is also improved with the adoption of multilateral negotiating regime from the initial stage of negotiation compared to bilateral negotiation.
منابع مشابه
Transfer of Bargaining Power Sources in Oil Trade Games
Bargaining Power is one of the important issues in oil trade negotiations. In this paper two effective factors in bargaining power i.e. patient time to deal and outside options of each player have been considered. The necessary relations for exchange of sources in negotiation have been derived.
متن کاملReview of Iran and Iraq Strategies for Exploitation of Common Oil Fields
The existence of numerous common oil and gas fields between Iran and the neighboring countries as well as Iran's less efficient exploitation of these fields compared with other beneficiary countries, has led the development of common fields to always be among the priorities of the Iran Petroleum Ministry. While introducing different methods applied for joint exploitation of common fields, this ...
متن کاملEmploying a Multi-Criteria Approach under Bankruptcy Conditions for Optimal Allocation of Shared Water Resources through Using Asymmetric Nash Bargaining Method
Management based on the flexibility, fairness, and sustainability characteristics of water resources may play a key role in preventing the continuation of the crisis process as well as reducing water users’ conflict. In the present research, the framework for the optimal allocation of shared water resources was presented using a combination of bankruptcy concepts and asymmetric Nash bargaining....
متن کاملOn-line Trade Negotiations: A Study of Perceived Fairness of Negotiation-Support Tools Usage
The proliferation of the digital economy has created a need for firms to negotiate business deals online. Negotiation support tools are likely to play a more critical role in web portal sites, manufacturer-supplier procurement sites, and on-line exchanges. Prior research has shown that negotiators concern themselves with fairness because they care about building and strengthening business relat...
متن کاملBargaining Delay in Multilateral Trade Negotiations
This paper theoretically and empirically explores bargaining delay in tariff negotiations. By imposing a bargaining structure in an equilibrium trade framework, I derive many testable predictions of delay. I then take my model to the newly compiled GATT (Torquay) tariff negotiation data, which includes detailed (product-level) information of the timing and contents of countries’ (back-and-forth...
متن کامل